The Role of AI-Powered Analytics in Building a Human-Centered Smart Campus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63876/ijss.v1i3.81Keywords:
Smart Campus, Artificial Intelligence, Learning Analytics, Human-Centered Design, Higher Education Digital Transformation, Student EngagementAbstract
The rapid digital transformation of higher education has accelerated the adoption of smart campus technologies integrating artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), and cloud computing. While existing initiatives often emphasize operational efficiency and infrastructure optimization, limited attention has been given to building human-centered smart campuses that prioritize student engagement, well-being, and academic success. This study investigates the role of AI-powered analytics in shaping adaptive, inclusive, and student-focused campus ecosystems, with an observational study conducted at De La Salle University (DLSU), Manila, Philippines. AI-driven analytics were deployed to process multi-source datasets, including IoT-enabled classroom sensors, learning management system (LMS) activity logs, and student survey feedback. The system generated predictive insights to identify at-risk learners, support personalized learning pathways, and recommend interventions for improved academic outcomes. Preliminary findings from the DLSU pilot revealed a 19% increase in course participation and a 12% reduction in dropout risk among vulnerable student groups. Additionally, real-time analytics enhanced campus services by optimizing space utilization, energy efficiency, and scheduling flexibility, indirectly improving student comfort and productivity. The results suggest that AI-powered analytics extend the smart campus paradigm beyond efficiency, enabling higher education institutions to foster human-centered learning environments that integrate inclusivity, well-being, and sustainability. By demonstrating how data-driven systems can support both academic and non-academic aspects of student life, this research positions AI as not only a technological enabler but also a catalyst for equitable and student-centered digital transformation in higher education.
Downloads
References
B. Bygstad, E. Øvrelid, S. Ludvigsen, and M. Dæhlen, “From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 182, p. 104463, Jun. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463.
Y. A. Adenle, E. H. W. Chan, Y. Sun, and C. K. Chau, “Assessing the relative importance of sustainability indicators for smart campuses: A case of higher education institutions in Nigeria,” Environ. Sustain. Indic., vol. 9, p. 100092, Feb. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100092.
O. Meddeb, M. Maraoui, and M. Zrigui, “Personalized Smart Learning Recommendation System for Arabic Users in Smart Campus,” Int. J. Web-Based Learn. Teach. Technol., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1–21, Sep. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.20211101.oa9.
W. A. Jabbar, C. W. Wei, N. A. A. M. Azmi, and N. A. Haironnazli, “An IoT Raspberry Pi-based parking management system for smart campus,” Internet of Things, vol. 14, p. 100387, Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2021.100387.
F. B. J, R. R, S. M, and G. M. N R, “IoT based Cloud Integrated Smart Classroom for smart and a sustainable Campus,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 172, pp. 77–81, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.012.
M. A. M.Sadeeq, “XDL-energy: Explainable hybrid deep learning framework for smart campus energy forecasting and anomaly justification using the DPU-ALDOSKI dataset,” Energy Build., vol. 347, p. 116305, Nov. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116305.
M. Gao, “Smart campus teaching system based on ZigBee wireless sensor network,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 2625–2635, Apr. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.09.001.
C. Xie, “Construction of Smart Campus Cloud Service Platform Based on Big Data Computer System,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 208, pp. 583–589, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.081.
M. Lillstrang, M. Harju, G. del Campo, G. Calderon, J. Röning, and S. Tamminen, “Implications of properties and quality of indoor sensor data for building machine learning applications: Two case studies in smart campuses,” Build. Environ., vol. 207, p. 108529, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108529.
A. A. Ajiboye, S. I. Popoola, O. B. Adewuyi, A. A. Atayero, and B. Adebisi, “Data-driven optimal planning for hybrid renewable energy system management in smart campus: A case study,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, vol. 52, p. 102189, Aug. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102189.
H. Boulton, “Exploring the effectiveness of new technologies: Improving literacy and engaging learners at risk of social exclusion in the UK,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 63, pp. 73–81, Apr. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.008.
C. M. Dagwasi and G. A. Opiniano, “No Filipino learners left behind: Anticipating health risks and remedies of online learning,” Public Heal. Pract., vol. 1, p. 100062, Nov. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100062.
K. J. Kim and S. Wang, “Understanding the acceptance of the Internet of Things: an integrative theoretical approach,” Aslib J. Inf. Manag., vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 754–771, Sep. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2021-0073.
G. Zhou, R. Wen, W. Tian, and R. Buyya, “Deep reinforcement learning-based algorithms selectors for the resource scheduling in hierarchical Cloud computing,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 208, p. 103520, Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103520.
L. Adie, L. Harris, and C. Wyatt-Smith, “Examining research into the use of data walls for teaching and learning: How are they being implemented within data use cycles?,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 89, p. 103012, Mar. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103012.
L. Liu and Y. Zhang, “Smart environment design planning for smart city based on deep learning,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, vol. 47, p. 101425, Oct. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101425.
B. Valks, M. Arkesteijn, and A. Den Heijer, “Smart campus tools 2.0 exploring the use of real-time space use measurement at universities and organizations,” Facilities, vol. 37, no. 13/14, pp. 961–980, Oct. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/F-11-2018-0136.
T. Eccarius, A. Leung, C.-W. Shen, M. Burke, and C.-C. Lu, “Prospects for shared electric velomobility: Profiling potential adopters at a multi-campus university,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 96, p. 103190, Oct. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103190.
S. N. Jansz, T. van Dijk, and M. P. Mobach, “Facilitating campus interactions – critical success factors according to university facility directors,” Facilities, vol. 39, no. 9/10, pp. 585–600, Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/F-03-2020-0031.
R. M. Chitrakar, D. C. Baker, and M. Guaralda, “How accessible are neighbourhood open spaces? Control of public space and its management in contemporary cities,” Cities, vol. 131, p. 103948, Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103948.
M. Elbertsen, H. Kok, and N. Salimi, “Designing the future smart campus: integrating key elements to enhance user experience,” J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag., vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 117–137, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2024-0414.
S. Singh, M. Sharma, and S. Dhir, “Modeling the effects of digital transformation in Indian manufacturing industry,” Technol. Soc., vol. 67, p. 101763, Nov. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101763.
